Comparing SOC 1 and SOC 2 Reports

SOC (System and Organization Controls) reports are governed by the American Institute of Certified Public Accountants (AICPA) and provide assurance that an organization adheres to rigorous standards. While they share a common lineage, their objectives and scopes differ significantly.

SOC 1: Financial-Focused Assurance

SOC 1 reports address controls over financial reporting. They’re essential for organizations handling sensitive financial data, especially for services like payroll, billing, and accounting.

• • Purpose: Evaluates controls impacting Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICFR).
  • Who Needs It: Commonly required by businesses offering financial or transaction-processing services.
  • Key Audience: Accounting professionals, auditors, and financial stakeholders.
  • Example: A payroll provider undergoing a SOC 1 audit ensures that its processes don’t introduce errors into its client’s financial statements.

SOC 2: Trust in Non-Financial Operations

SOC 2 reports focus on systems handling sensitive data, emphasizing the Trust Services Criteria (TSC): Security, Availability, Processing Integrity, Confidentiality, and Privacy.

1. • Purpose: Evaluates data protection controls, ensuring compliance with operational and security standards.
   • Who Needs It: Service providers managing sensitive customer data, including SaaS platforms and cloud service providers.
   • Key Audience: IT teams, compliance officers, and business stakeholders concerned with data security.
   • Example: A cloud storage provider undergoing a SOC 2 audit ensures that customer data is encrypted, protected, and accessible when needed.

While both SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports aim to establish trust and transparency, their scope, purpose, and relevance vary significantly, catering to distinct operational needs and audiences. Below is a detailed exploration of their key differences:

1. Objectives

The primary objective of each report is tailored to specific organizational needs and stakeholder expectations:

• • SOC 1: Ensures that internal processes and systems directly influencing financial statements operate effectively and do not introduce errors into financial reporting. These audits focus on mitigating risks associated with financial data handling, ensuring compliance with frameworks like Sarbanes-Oxley (SOX). For example, a payroll company seeking to assure clients that employee compensation calculations are accurate and compliant would require a SOC 1 report.
  • SOC 2: Confirms that systems handling sensitive data adhere to robust operational and security standards, safeguarding against breaches and data misuse. SOC 2 is grounded in the Trust Services Criteria (TSC), addressing a broader spectrum of non-financial risks, such as cybersecurity threats, data availability, and privacy. This report is vital for businesses like SaaS providers and cloud service firms managing critical customer data.

2. Scope

The scope determines the breadth of controls and risks each report evaluates:

• • SOC 1: Focuses narrowly on financial reporting controls, assessing how an organization’s processes affect its clients’ financial statements. For example, an accounts receivable service must demonstrate that it correctly processes invoice data and prevents inaccuracies.
  • SOC 2: Encompasses a broader operational framework, evaluating controls beyond financial metrics. These include measures to secure systems, ensure data confidentiality, and provide uninterrupted service availability. A SOC 2 audit might assess whether a cloud provider’s infrastructure includes firewalls, encryption, and disaster recovery protocols.

3. Intended Audience

The audience for each report reflects its purpose and the type of assurance it provides:

• • SOC 1: Primarily intended for financial stakeholders, such as external auditors, CFOs, and controllers, who rely on the report to evaluate risks tied to financial reporting. For example, a client’s financial auditor might review a SOC 1 report to ensure a service provider’s systems do not distort revenue recognition.
  • SOC 2: Tailored for a wider audience, including customers, IT teams, compliance officers, and regulators. Its focus on security and operational excellence makes it a critical tool for businesses evaluating third-party vendors for secure data management. For instance, a SOC 2 report might reassure a healthcare client that a cloud provider complies with HIPAA and ensures patient data security.

4. Criteria Evaluated

The criteria each report evaluates reflect its foundational goals:

• • SOC 1: Measures effectiveness of controls related to Internal Control over Financial Reporting (ICFR). The controls align closely with financial auditing frameworks and typically include processes like transaction processing, reconciliation, and access to financial systems.
  • SOC 2: Based on the Trust Services Criteria (TSC), it evaluates five key areas:
    • Security: Ensures systems are protected against unauthorized access.
    • Availability: Confirms systems are operational and accessible when needed.
    • Processing Integrity: Verifies that data processing is accurate and reliable.
    • Confidentiality: Ensures sensitive data is protected against unauthorized access.
    • Privacy: Evaluates how personal information is collected, stored, and used.

SOC 2 criteria are highly customizable, allowing organizations to focus on specific areas most relevant to their business and customers.

5. Relevance

The relevance of SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports depends on the nature of the services provided and the type of assurance stakeholders require:

• • SOC 1: Ideal for organizations directly impacting client financial statements, such as payroll processors, billing services, and financial software providers. For example, an organization that processes customer payments must ensure its systems accurately calculate and allocate funds without creating financial discrepancies.
  • SOC 2: Crucial for technology-driven businesses that manage sensitive customer data, including cloud platforms, IT service providers, and SaaS companies. For instance, a SOC 2 report could confirm that a cloud hosting company employs adequate encryption protocols to protect client data from cyberattacks.

Selecting the appropriate SOC report is pivotal for aligning your compliance efforts with organizational objectives, client expectations, and industry standards. Below is an in-depth exploration of the factors to consider when determining whether SOC 1, SOC 2, or both are most suitable for your business.

1. Assess Your Business Activities

The first step in choosing the correct SOC report is to evaluate your core services and the type of data your organization handles:

• • When SOC 1 is the Right Choice

    If your services directly affect your clients’ financial reporting, a SOC 1 report is essential. Examples include:If your services directly affect your clients’ financial reporting, a SOC 1 report is essential. Examples include:

    • A payroll processing company ensuring accurate payroll calculations and tax withholdings, which directly impact financial statements.
    • A billing service provider managing invoicing systems that clients rely on for revenue recognition.

SOC 1 compliance demonstrates that your internal controls mitigate risks to financial data accuracy and integrity, giving financial auditors and stakeholders the confidence they need.

• • When SOC 2 is the Right Choice

If your primary focus is on safeguarding sensitive customer data or ensuring the operational integrity of your services, a SOC 2 report is more relevant. Examples include:

• • • A cloud hosting provider ensuring secure storage of customer files with high uptime.
    • A healthcare SaaS platform managing ePHI under HIPAA guidelines, where confidentiality and privacy are paramount.

SOC 2 compliance highlights your commitment to operational excellence and data security, which is critical for industries like technology, healthcare, and retail

• • Specialized Scenarios

Some businesses may straddle both domains. For instance, a financial software company that processes transactions and provides operational insights might require both SOC 1 (for financial controls) and SOC 2 (for data security).

2. Understand Stakeholder Needs

The first step in choosing the correct SOC report is to evaluate your core services and the type of data your organization handles:

• • When Clients or Partners Require SOC 1

    SOC 1 reports are often a requirement in industries where financial integrity is paramount. For example:

    • Banks and financial institutions may demand SOC 1 compliance from vendors like accounting service providers to ensure financial reporting risks are controlled.
    • Investment firms working with third-party analytics platforms might need assurance that financial data is accurate and compliant with regulatory standards.

• • When SOC 2 is Expected

SOC 2 compliance is typically a priority for clients and partners in technology-driven sectors. For example:

• • • A tech company considering a third-party CRM platform will expect SOC 2 compliance to verify that customer data is secure and system availability is guaranteed.
    • Healthcare organizations may seek SOC 2 compliance to ensure vendors align with HIPAA requirements for data privacy.

• • Regulatory Expectations

Depending on your industry, regulatory requirements may dictate the need for one or both reports. For example, organizations handling protected health information (PHI) may need SOC 2 reports to demonstrate compliance with privacy criteria and SOC 1 reports to meet financial reporting obligations.

3. Hybrid Scenarios: When Both SOC 1 and SOC 2 Reports are Necessary

Some organizations operate in environments where both SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports are critical. These hybrid scenarios often arise in businesses offering multifaceted services:

• • Example 1: Payroll Software Provider

    • SOC 1 Need: Assures clients that payroll calculations, tax withholdings, and financial transactions are accurate, mitigating risks to financial reporting.
    • SOC 2 Need: Demonstrates that sensitive employee information (e.g., salaries, tax IDs) is securely stored and processed in compliance with privacy standards.

• • Example 2: Cloud ERP System

• • • SOC 1 Need: Provides assurance that financial modules like accounts payable and receivable are accurate and align with clients’ financial reporting requirements.
    • SOC 2 Need: Validates the security, availability, and confidentiality of the ERP platform, addressing client concerns about data integrity and cybersecurity threats.

• • Example 3: Healthcare Technology Platform

• • • SOC 1 Need: Demonstrates that billing and financial reporting functionalities integrate accurately with healthcare providers’ systems.
    • SOC 2 Need: Verifies that patient data is managed securely, with robust access controls and adherence to privacy criteria.

Factors to Consider in Hybrid Scenarios

• • Resource Allocation: Conducting both SOC 1 and SOC 2 audits requires significant time, effort, and financial investment. Organizations should assess their internal resources and consider hiring experienced compliance consultants to streamline the process.
  • Prioritization: Start with the report that is most critical to your primary stakeholders and regulatory obligations. For example, a payroll processor might prioritize SOC 1 to meet immediate client needs and pursue SOC 2 compliance in subsequent phases.
  • Combined Audits: Some organizations may benefit from integrating SOC 1 and SOC 2 assessments into a single engagement, reducing redundancies and saving costs. Ensure your auditor has expertise in conducting combined audits to maximize efficiency.

Choosing the right SOC report requires a strategic and systematic approach to ensure alignment with your business operations, compliance needs, and stakeholder expectations. Here’s an expanded guide on each step to help you make an informed decision

1. Map Your Services to Risk Domains

The type of SOC report your organization requires depends on the nature of your services and the associated risks.

• • SOC 1: Focuses on financial reporting controls. Ask yourself:
    • Do your services directly influence the financial statements of your clients?
    • Are you responsible for functions like payroll processing, billing, or revenue recognition?
    • For example, a third-party payroll service provider needs SOC 1 compliance to reassure clients that payroll calculations are accurate and align with financial reporting requirements.
  • SOC 2: Emphasizes operational security. Consider:
    • Does your business manage sensitive customer data, like personal or financial information?
    • Are you involved in industries like SaaS, cloud storage, or healthcare that prioritize data security, availability, and confidentiality?
    • For instance, a SaaS platform handling customer login credentials and transactional data must demonstrate robust security controls through SOC 2 compliance.
  • Both SOC 1 and SOC 2: Certain businesses, like ERP providers, may span both domains. A comprehensive understanding of the scope of your services is essential to ensure that you address all relevant compliance needs.

2. Consult Stakeholders Early

Stakeholders often have specific compliance expectations that directly influence which SOC report is most relevant. Engaging them early in the decision-making process ensures alignment:

• • Clients and Partners:
    • What kind of assurance do they need? Financial control accuracy (SOC 1) or data security (SOC 2)?
    • For example, a financial institution may demand SOC 1 compliance from its accounting software provider, while a tech company would prioritize SOC 2.
  • Internal Teams:
    • Speak with legal, IT, and risk management teams to understand internal needs.
    • IT might emphasize SOC 2 for security and availability, while the finance team may advocate for SOC 1 to ensure regulatory adherence.
  • Regulatory Bodies:
    • Ensure that compliance decisions align with industry-specific regulatory frameworks. For example, a healthcare SaaS provider might need SOC 2 compliance to address HIPAA requirements.

Regular communication with stakeholders avoids misalignment and builds confidence in your compliance efforts.

3. Perform a Gap Analysis

A gap analysis is a critical step in identifying deficiencies in your current controls and understanding the steps needed to achieve compliance.

• • Evaluate Current Practices Against SOC Criteria:
    • Review your existing processes for alignment with SOC 1 (financial controls) or SOC 2 (Trust Services Criteria) requirements.
    • Example: If your IT team lacks documented incident response plans, this would be a gap in SOC 2 compliance under the security criteria.
  • Prioritize Gaps Based on Risk:
    • Focus first on gaps that pose the highest risks to financial reporting or data security.
    • Example: Missing encryption controls for sensitive data would be a high-priority gap for SOC 2.
  • Actionable Insights:
    • Use the results of the gap analysis to draft a roadmap for remediation. This roadmap should outline specific actions, timelines, and responsibilities to close identified gaps.

A detailed gap analysis ensures that your compliance efforts are targeted and efficient, minimizing unnecessary costs or redundancies.

4. Leverage Expert Guidance

Compliance requirements can be complex, and expert advice can save time, resources, and stress.

• • Engage SOC Auditors Early:
    • Partner with experienced auditors or compliance consultants who specialize in SOC frameworks. They can help:
      • Interpret SOC criteria and their application to your business.
      • Identify potential risks or gaps.
      • Suggest practical strategies for compliance.
    • Example: An auditor with experience in SaaS environments can offer specific insights into the Trust Services Criteria most relevant to your business.
  • Hybrid Scenarios:
    • Experts can simplify the process of pursuing both SOC 1 and SOC 2 by integrating assessments to avoid duplicated effort.
  • Technology Tools:
    • Consultants may also recommend automated compliance tools to streamline tasks like monitoring, reporting, and evidence collection.

5. Develop a Holistic Compliance Strategy

Compliance is not just a checkbox—it’s a foundation for trust, operational excellence, and competitive advantage.

• • Create a Long-Term Plan:
    • Build a compliance program that evolves with your business needs and industry changes.
    • Example: If your organization plans to expand into new markets, consider potential changes to compliance requirements and incorporate them into your roadmap.
  • Invest in Training:
    • Ensure your team understands the importance of SOC compliance and their role in maintaining it. Regular training builds a culture of accountability and reduces the likelihood of control failures.

SOC reports are not merely compliance checkboxes—they serve as essential tools that help organizations establish trust, enhance operational transparency, and meet regulatory requirements. Here’s an expanded look at how SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports apply in real-world scenarios:

SOC 1 in Action

SOC 1 reports are designed to evaluate controls over financial reporting processes, making them invaluable for service providers who directly affect their clients’ financial statements.

• • Payroll Providers

    • Use Case: Payroll providers manage critical financial processes such as salary disbursement, tax filings, and benefit contributions. These activities directly impact their clients’ financial reporting.
    • Example: A payroll processing company with SOC 1 compliance assures its clients that payroll calculations are accurate, tax filings are timely, and all financial data is handled securely.
    • Business Value:
      • Builds confidence among clients and stakeholders by demonstrating adherence to financial regulations.
      • Reduces the likelihood of payroll errors, tax penalties, or compliance breaches, which could impact clients’ financial statements.

  • Billing Services

    • Use Case: Companies providing billing services generate invoices, manage accounts receivable, and reconcile financial data for their clients.
    • Example: A healthcare billing company with a SOC 1 report assures hospitals that their patient billing processes are accurate, timely, and aligned with financial reporting standards.
    • Business Value:
      • Mitigates risks related to invoicing errors or delayed revenue recognition.
      • Reinforces client trust by ensuring transparency and reliability in financial reporting.

  • Investment Fund Administrators

    • Use Case: Administrators who manage fund accounting, NAV calculations, and investor reporting must ensure the accuracy of financial data.
    • Example: A fund administrator’s SOC 1 report confirms that their controls effectively prevent errors in calculating investment returns or managing investor distributions.
    • Business Value:
      • Provides assurance to clients and auditors that the fund’s financial data is accurate and compliant with regulations.

2. SOC 2 in Action

SOC 2 reports evaluate controls related to data security and operational integrity, making them essential for businesses managing sensitive customer data or delivering technology-driven services.

• • Cloud Service Providers

    • Use Case: Cloud service providers store and process vast amounts of sensitive customer data, making data breaches a critical concern.
    • Example: A cloud provider with SOC 2 compliance demonstrates robust controls for protecting customer data from unauthorized access, data loss, and other security threats.
    • Business Value:
      • Enhances client confidence in the security and availability of cloud-hosted data.
      • Attracts business from industries with stringent compliance needs, such as finance or healthcare.

  • Healthcare SaaS Platforms

    • Use Case: Platforms managing electronic health records (EHR) or patient data must comply with regulations like HIPAA while maintaining data confidentiality, integrity, and availability.
    • Example: A healthcare SaaS provider with a SOC 2 report validates that it implements HIPAA-aligned controls, such as encryption, access restrictions, and regular audits.
    • Business Value:
      • Demonstrates a commitment to patient data security and regulatory compliance.
      • Strengthens partnerships with hospitals, clinics, and insurers by providing evidence of secure data handling.

  • eCommerce Platforms

    • Use Case: eCommerce companies process sensitive customer information, including payment details and personal data.
    • Example: An eCommerce platform’s SOC 2 compliance ensures it has implemented controls to protect against cyber threats, fraud, and downtime.
    • Business Value:
      • Boosts consumer trust in the platform’s ability to safeguard their data during transactions.
      • Reduces the risk of reputational damage from security incidents or data breaches.

  • Managed Service Providers (MSPs)

    • Use Case: MSPs offering IT support and infrastructure management must maintain high standards of data security and system reliability.
    • Example: An MSP with SOC 2 compliance can demonstrate to clients that it adheres to best practices for incident response, system availability, and data integrity.
    • Business Value:
      • Positions the MSP as a trusted partner for businesses outsourcing critical IT functions.
      • Provides a competitive edge in securing contracts with highly regulated industries.

Hybrid Scenarios: When Both Reports Matter

Certain businesses may find that both SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports are relevant to their operations.

• • Example: A payroll software provider not only calculates salaries (requiring SOC 1) but also manages sensitive employee data and provides an online portal for data access (necessitating SOC 2).
  • Business Value:
    • Demonstrates a comprehensive commitment to both financial accuracy and data security.
    • Reduces friction during vendor assessments by addressing diverse compliance needs with both reports.

By leveraging SOC 1 and SOC 2 reports effectively, organizations can address the unique compliance expectations of their industry while building trust and confidence among their clients and partners.

1. SOC 2 is a More Advanced Version of SOC 1

Why It’s False:
SOC 1 and SOC 2 address entirely different objectives, entirely different purposes and are not hierarchical or interchangeable.

2. Only Technology Companies Need SOC 2

Why It’s False:
While SOC 2 is prevalent in tech, it is applicable to any organization that handles sensitive customer data or provides services reliant on operational trust.

3. SOC Reports Are a One-Time Requirement

Why It’s False:
SOC compliance is not a “set it and forget it” process. Organizations must undergo annual audits to ensure their controls remain effective and adapt to evolving standards and threats.

4. SOC Reports Guarantee Compliance with All Standards

Why It’s False:
SOC reports assess specific controls against predefined criteria but do not certify compliance with broader regulatory frameworks like HIPAA, GDPR, or PCI DSS.

5. SOC Reports Are Only for Large Companies

Why It’s False:
SOC reports are beneficial for organizations of all sizes, especially those seeking to build credibility and trust.

6. SOC Reports Are Only Useful for External Stakeholders

Why It’s False:
SOC reports provide valuable insights for internal stakeholders, helping improve operational efficiency and identify gaps in risk management.

7. SOC Reports Cover Everything in an Organization

Why It’s False:
SOC reports are scoped to specific systems or services. They don’t cover every aspect of an organization’s operations.

8. Passing a SOC Audit Means No Future Risks

Why It’s False:
A SOC report reflects the effectiveness of controls during a specific audit period and does not guarantee immunity from future risks or failures.

Understanding the distinctions between SOC 1 and SOC 2 is crucial for aligning compliance efforts with organizational goals. Whether you’re ensuring financial integrity or safeguarding customer data, selecting the right report demonstrates your commitment to excellence and trustworthiness.

At Audit Peak, we specialize in simplifying SOC audits, providing tailored guidance, and ensuring your compliance framework supports your business objectives.

Contact us today to learn how we can help your organization achieve compliance excellence and instill confidence in your stakeholders.

WE WILL TAKE YOU TO THE PEAK.